Indemnification Clauses: Benefits and Traps
What is an Indemnification Clause? You may have seen such a clause buried in the fine print of a contract but do you understand what it means? In short, an Indemnification Clause is a risk-shifting agreement; one party agrees to accept the risk and financial consequences of specified injuries or legal claims that may occur in the future. Indemnification clauses often contain the language “X agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Y from . . . “.
Though unfortunately labeled “boilerplate” – i.e. the legalese almost no one bothers to read – the indemnification clause, when properly constructed, is a powerful tool in your contract. It can also be a trap when carelessly drafted. Read further to learn why.
Why use indemnification clauses?
All contracts involve risk. When two parties enter into a contract, they are also agreeing how to apportion the risk. For example, if ABC leases an office to MNO, the parties face the risk of natural disaster, accidental damage, personal injury, intentional misconduct, and more. When negotiating the lease a knowledgeable attorney will explain to her client the ramifications of the indemnification clause and draft a clause specifically addressing the risks of greatest concern to the parties.
What should an indemnification clause address?
A properly constructed indemnification clause will identify:
- The parties protected (often not just the parties to the contract, but extended to others, such as customers or boards of directors),
- The types of damages, claims, and legal actions that will invoke the indemnification responsibilities of the party accepting the risk (the indemnitor),
- The process for notifying the indemnitor of an actual or potential claim,
- Which party will take on the responsibility for defending the claim,
- Which party is financially responsible for damages, awards, attorney fees, fines, and other expenses and whether there are any caps on these amounts, and
- Whether a party must consent to settling the matter.
Indemnification Clause Traps
Unfortunately too many attorneys act as scriveners (a fancy word for copying text) and do not use their critical thinking skills. These is apparent in many indemnification clauses. Some traps include:
- Overly broad clauses that hold you liable for more than you believed you would be. For example, an overly broad clause may hold your business liable for third-party acts, attorneys fees, consequential damages, or even the other party’s negligence if you do not carefully draft your clause.
- Overly narrow clauses that do not provide sufficient redress in the event your business faces economic loss. Like the overly broad clause, an overly narrow clause could fail to provide the remedies you expected, such as damages due to acts of third parties and the recovery of attorneys’ fees and consequential damages.
- There are times when it is strategic to allow the indemnification clause be the exclusive remedy and there are times when you would prefer the availability of all legal remedies. Understand whether and how an indemnification clause limits your future ability to recover damages.
- Indemnification clauses can cap the amount of damages you may recover. Likewise, they can include thresholds in which you cannot recover until you incur a certain threshold of damage. There are also baskets, offsets, and other combinations to limit one party’s liability and limit the other party’s recovery. If not carefully drafted, you may not recover the amount you anticipated.
Indemnification clauses are much more than mere boilerplate. They are, when thoughtfully and carefully written, are a valuable part of your contract. Although your attorney has a duty to understand these clauses and carefully draft and negotiate them, educating yourself and understanding your agreement is a smart move that can result in strategic decisions later during the term of your agreement.